Showing posts with label Apples. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apples. Show all posts

Monday, 12 September 2011

Apple's iPhone 5 To Have The Same 3.5-Inch Screen Size?

You are in an iPhone Post

We've been hearing mixed rumors about the upcoming iPhone's screen size: initially we heard about Cupertino preparing a four-inch screen and more recently we've heard that it will be less than four inches, probably around 3.7. Now, to top it all, there are rumors of Apple keeping the iPhone 4's screen dimension for the next iPhone too, which will make it sport a 3.5-inch display.

Of course the information is not official and is based on the opinions of analysts. While some might argue about the overall accuracy of analyst predictions, other might take their opinions for granted. Truth is that the iPhone 4's 3.5-inch display is slowly considered to be too small by many, especially if we compare it to the average Android screen (not to mention massive screens like the 5.3-inches on the Galaxy Note). Others consider it the sweet spot but at the end of the day, Apple is the one in charge and we don't have that much to wait for the next Apple-phone(s).

Source: Digital Spy

Previous Page Next Page

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Friday, 22 July 2011

Apple’s share of Nortel patent purchase: $2.6B

Apple It turns out Apple wasn’t just a participant in the consortium that included Microsoft, Sony and Research in Motion that won the auction for Nortel’s patent portfolio: It contributed more than half of the $4.5 billion purchase price. Mobile patent portfolios that are up for grabs have become strategically important for Apple to defend itself in a variety of patent disputes over mobile devices with Samsung, Nokia, HTC and others.

From Apple’s 10-Q filed with the SEC Wednesday:

On June 27, 2011, the Company, as part of a consortium, participated in the acquisition of Nortel’s patent portfolio for an overall purchase price of $4.5 billion, of which the Company’s contribution will be approximately $2.6 billion. This asset acquisition is subject to approval by various regulatory agencies.

Google may have lost out to the Apple-led consortium on Nortel, but it’s back on the hunt. It’s been reported that both Google and Apple are also interested in scooping up another collection of intellectual property up for sale, that of mobile-phone designer InterDigital.

It’s clear Apple is ready to play defense on its products, as COO Tim Cook warned Tuesday, “We want people to invent their own stuff. We’re going to make sure we defend our portfiolio from everyone.”

But bulking up on Nortel’s patents, and potentially InterDigital’s, shows Apple is prepared to go on the offensive too.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user Robert S. Donovan

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

How the iPad is driving Apple’s business

iPad 2

When Apple released its third-quarter 2011 earnings results today the numbers were, as is becoming almost customary for the Cupertino crew lately, a huge blow-out. Success was spread over many parts of the business, particularly the company’s flagship products, the iPhone and the Mac. Both are growing and show that Apple is on a tear with the entirety of its business. But those iPad results? Those were fairly stunning.

While Android phones are outpacing the iPhone in market share, it’s clear that Apple is not anywhere close to giving up its lead in the tablet race. And despite the seemingly endless train of new tablets popping up, Apple is putting more space between its tablet and the rest of the field.

Here are the most important numbers from Apple’s earnings that show that the iPad is seemingly unstoppable, and clearly Apple’s most important product.

$6 billion: That’s how much money Apple made from the iPad just in April, May, and June of this year. The key is that Apple now makes more money off the iPad, a slightly more than a year old product, than its Mac lineup. Apple pulled in just under $5 billion in revenue from Mac desktops and notebooks during the same quarter.

The people scooping up iPads are not just gadget hounds and consumers with expendable income. Buyers include large corporations who are handing them out to employees to help them do their job, something Apple has been actively pushing for a while. But Apple is also getting a boost in iPad sales even from sources the company didn’t anticipate.

“We sold more iPads to K-12 [schools] than we did Macs, which is absolutely shocking,” said Apple COO Tim Cook on a conference call with analysts today. “We never would have predicted that.”

“Shocking,” perhaps. But probably not unwelcome. Apple very likely doesn’t mind getting kids used to working on iPads in elementary school.

9.25 million: That’s how many iPads Apple sold during the quarter. That blows away what Apple sold a year ago, just 3.3 million iPads, or a 183 percent bump. So what’s changed in the last quarter? Apple’s obviously had more than a year to advertise the product and build a customer base. But an important step is that Apple’s gotten its iPad supply-chain act together. If you’ll recall the situation a year ago, the original iPad was extremely hard to find. Last year Apple didn’t catch up on the seemingly insatiable demand for the original iPad until later in the summer.

Apple admitted earlier this year it couldn’t make iPad 2s fast enough to keep up with demand. Now, Apple is still selling “every iPad 2 it makes,” but also said it was able to make more iPads 2s during the most recent quarter than it did in the same period a year ago. So while demand is still ahead of supply (“Sales of the iPad 2 have been absolutely a frenzy,” said Cook), they’re getting closer to meeting it. Cook went as far as to say that in some markets they had actually caught up and were able to be in some sort of an equilibrium with demand and supply. He did not, however, expand on which markets.

14 percent: That’s actually not an iPad number. That’s how much Mac sales grew durng this most recent quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago. While iPads are outgrowing Macs, they’re doing it without significantly affecting the Mac business.

Sure, Cook allowed, “we do believe that some customers chose ot purchase an iPad instead of a new Mac during the quarter. But we also believe that even more customers purchased n iPad over a Windows PC. There’s a lot more of the PC business to cannibalize over the Mac.”

Apple has been banging the “post-PC” drum pretty hard since it introduced the iPad, and at least some of its tablet competitors are selling the tablet as a PC in a different form factor. Surging iPad sales in addition to steadily growing Mac sales could mean that Apple customers are buying into Apple’s view of the computing world too.

222 million: That’s the total number of iOS-based devices that are floating around in people’s pockets, purses, and briefcases: iPhones, iPads, and iPod Touches. That’s compared to 130 million Android devices that Google recently announced. While the iPhone has a three-year headstart on the iPad, it’s clear that Apple’s tablet is pushing those numbers up.

$2.5 billion: Money Apple paid back to developers whose apps sold through its store so far. That, along with the previous iOS device tally, are really meant to be siren calls for developers.

The number of iOS devices, representing the continued viability of the iPhone as a platform for selling your apps and the growth of the iPad, are numbers Apple likes to remind app makers of regularly. It’s a strategy to let those who are or might be attracted to the growing number of Android gadgets floating around that not only is iOS continuing to grow, it’s also good for business.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user William Hook

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/apple/how-the-ipad-is-driving-apples-business/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 378528);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

Click to log in with: Not you? Remember me Submitting comment...
;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 14 July 2011

Judge won’t speed up Apple’s suit against Samsung

Part of Apple’s recent suit against Samsung for allegedly copying many of the physical and software attributes of the iPhone won’t get fast-tracked like Apple had hoped. Earlier this month, the Cupertino, Calif.–based company moved to shorten the briefing process and proposed a schedule that puts the case in front of a jury by next February. The case schedule is still unknown, but the briefing process won’t begin on July 21, as Apple had hoped.

The main reason for the lack of haste appears to be due to the length of time that Apple and Samsung attempted to work out the issues prior to Apple filing suit. According to Florian Mueller’s FOSS Patents site, the two companies were in discussions for more than a year:

Moreover, Apple indicated at the May 12, 2011 hearing that it had been aware of its infringement claims for at least a year and engaged in negotiations with Samsung during that time. See Transcript of May 12, 2011 [...] (‘there have been extended efforts . . . to resolve this problem short of litigation. . . . they’ve been going on for at least a year’). The Court agrees with Samsung that the length of time Apple has been aware of its claims and the long history of infringement alleged in the complaint undermine Apple’s claims of urgency to some extent.

In the grand scheme of the overall case, the denial to shorten or quickly get to the briefing period probably won’t have any measurable impact. And it doesn’t say anything about the likely case verdict, although it suggests that the judge doesn’t believe Apple’s business is currently so damaged by Samsung’s products that the case warrants faster action. To be honest, I don’t know of anyone who bought a Samsung product and thought they bought something from Apple, even with the obvious similarities in look and feel. And customers generally have a return period of at least 14 days for a smartphone, so if they wanted Apple and bought Samsung, there’s time to make the swap.

The talks around infringement between Apple and Samsung for at least a year reinforce the idea that Apple has been treading carefully with Samsung, likely due to its reliance upon Samsung for key device components. Apple doesn’t produce its own chips, flash memory or touchscreen displays, although it has designed the ARM-based A4 and dual-core A5 chips that power its mobile devices. It’s far too early to say how this case will be resolved, but I’d bet money that Apple is looking for other component suppliers outside Samsung where possible. Until then, Samsung will keep following an Apple-like strategy, helping it become the smartphone king.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/apple/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 374961);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.