Showing posts with label Should. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Should. Show all posts

Friday, 23 September 2011

Should You Sell Your iPhone 4 Now?

You are in an iPhone Post

Even if they've only had their iPhone 4 for about a year (or just a matter of months for Verizon subscribers), the arrival of Apple's next iPhone will mean, for many users, that it's time to ditch last year's model. Unless you like keeping an expensive backup, that path is going to lead to the used gadget market, whether that means selling your iPhone 4 to a retailer specializing in used hardware, putting her up on eBay, or posting to your local Craigslist. No matter how you go about it, you can count on getting less for your phone the longer you wait. Should you just go ahead and sell now, before the new iPhone is even announced?

Historic pricing trends for older iPhones in years past reveal that waiting for the phone's announcement to sell means you can expect to get 10-15% less for the iPhone 4 than you would have just a few weeks earlier. If you hold out until the iPhone 5 is in stores, your phone's value could end up losing a quarter of its worth.

Clearly, there's money to be saved by acting quickly, but does a higher sale price balance out the weeks you'll have to wait with no iPhone to call your own? We're guessing "no" for many of you, or else we wouldn't see figures like these in the first place; the reason prices dip when they do is precisely because that's when everyone is trying to off-load their old hardware all at once, with lots of you waiting to sell until you have the new hotness in-hand.

Source: BGR, NextWorth

Previous Page Next Page

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Advertising - Should You Be Advertising Your Services?


You offer a reliable, quality service. You know that if more people knew what you can do, you'd increase sales. So you advertise in the most likely media for potential clients to read about you. But there's no response. Why?

If this scenario is familiar to you there's a few likely causes.

1. Maybe your ad's aren't designed well - poor layout, inappropriate offer, etc.

2. Maybe you have selected the wrong media, placement or timing.

3. Maybe you shouldn't be advertising your services.

Now I know there's a lot to consider when writing advertisements - creating "killer headlines", long copy versus short copy arguments, using white space, etc - and I could give you some tips on how to buy media. But I'm not getting into that today. I'm going to talk about the third point - maybe you shouldn't advertise.

But wait! (I hear you ask)... Why shouldn't I advertise my business?

Put simply, some services are not suitable to be advertised in the usual fashion. Most advertising is to stimulate action, usually a purchase or decision to place an order. If you're selling a 'product' this is relatively easy to achieve. Customers know what they are buying. There's usually some sort of benchmark, or product criteria, customers use to judge whether your product will do what they want.

But when it comes to services, many potential customers (or clients - I use both terms interchangeably) may not be able to make the same sort of judgement. This is particularly the case for services where the specific outcome is hard to predict, or where there is a large degree of emotional involvement or risk in the customers decision making process.

Think about it this way. Services can be broadly classified under the following headings:

* People Processing (eg hairdresser, medical)

* Possession Processing (eg computer repairs, dog obedience training)

* Knowledge Processing (eg education, entertainment)

* Information Processing (eg accounting, investment advice)

Generally speaking, possession and people processing services are more tangible than knowledge or information processing. For possession and people processing services, clients can see/touch/feel the outcomes, and they may even be personally involved in the delivery of the actual service. Additionally, tangible services usually incorporate a higher level of personal contact (intensity or frequency) between the provider and the customer.

So, for more tangible services, clients often have more reference points on which to base a future purchase decision.

If your business provides services with less tangible, and more variable, outcomes then media advertising may not be the best answer for you. For your type of services customers will be very interested to understand 'how' you deliver your service and will need to develop a suitable degree of trust in you before they will make the decision to use your services. These criteria cannot be fully met through advertising alone.

So what should you do to get more business?

Here are a few ideas:

* Perform your service to an excellent standard - surpassing mere customer satisfaction.

* Provide information to educate your potential clients.

* Develop sales processes that identify real problems you can solve.

* Make sure you address the true concerns and risks of your clients.

* Understand the clues customers use to decide whether they will use you.

* Create a network of related service providers who may refer prospects to you.

* Develop mutually beneficial joint-promotional activities with well-respected businesses in complementary fields.

Please don't misunderstand my message. Advertising can be very productive. If you can clearly state specific benefits (i.e. outcomes) and overcome the initial concerns of prospective clients, then advertising may work for you. That's why possession processing services such as lawn mowing can be easily advertised. For your average lawn the customer can recognise and understand what they are buying.

However, if your business provides relatively intangible services that deliver outcomes dependent upon a variety of factors, then media advertising should not be high on your list of marketing activities.

(c) 2004 Marketing Nous Pty Ltd




Stuart Ayling runs Marketing Nous, an Australasian marketing consultancy that specialises in marketing for service businesses. He helps clients to improve their marketing tactics, attract more clients, and increase revenue. Stuart also offers telephone consultations and runs regular marketing seminars. For additional marketing resources, including Stuart's popular monthly newsletter, visit his web site at http://www.marketingnous.com.au.





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Should Your Company Outsource to an Inbound Call Center Service?


The holiday season often brings an increase in incoming calls for many businesses. If your business is becoming overwhelmed, outsourcing to an inbound call center service or a phone reply service is a great way to not only handle the holiday influx but to continue to handle growing call volumes without investing a great deal of time and money to add to your internal staff.

Years ago, inbound answer services and phone respond services were considered completely different animals. Your business fit into one or the other category but not both. Today, many phone respond service providers have much of the same technology and range of services as do answer service providers.

Consider the following benefits of outsourcing your call center needs to an inbound & outbound outsourcing service or phone reply service.

Meet Your Needs -- Many outsourcing center and phone reply services offer a variety of support services, such as multi-lingual call-answering and/or translation options. You may also be able to find an inbound call center service or phone reaction service that specializes in your industry.
Save Money - Yes, save money. If your company is growing, then you need to consider how you are investing your capital to maintain growth. Your infrastructure and salary expenses can be reduced considerably when you use these services or phone reply services instead of investing in staff and technology yourself.
24/7 and 365 -- Call support every day, all day can be very expensive in terms of hiring and/or managing reliable staff for all shifts as well as absorbing the expense of turnover. However, this is the core business of an inbound call center service or phone response service. They are well equipped to have experienced agents ready at all times, along with having backups in place to compensate for unplanned absences.
Test the Waters -- You do not need to send all of your calls to an inbound call center service. You can route some of your calls and see if the service is right for your business. This is a perfect time to use a phone respond service, which often is smaller than an inbound call center service yet offers the same capabilities.
Budget for Call Volume -- You may know how many customer calls your staff fields on a regular basis, as well as the amount of time each call takes. However, a more accurate number helps to accurately budget for the expense. It is possible you may find you only need to use an inbound call center service or phone respond service during high call-volume times like holidays or certain seasons.
Customers First -- While it is easy to see how efficient and cost effective an inbound call center service or phone retort service can be on your balance sheet, it is even more important that the service provide superior customer care to your clients. To ensure this, you have to provide a detailed description of how your business manages calls. The best inbound call center services and phone response services work with your current system -- and with you -- to develop a plan and training to provide that high level of customer service you are looking for.
Inland or Offshore -- Once you decide on an inbound call center service or phone respond service, you then need to determine whether you want your call center operations to be located offshore. The main reason businesses choose offshore call centers is to save money. However, there are some "costs" associated with such a move. English is usually a second language to offshore agents who answer incoming calls. That may make it more difficult to provide the level of customer service your clients are used to receiving from your business. The language difference and location can also impact the amount of time you can dedicate to properly training the agents handling your calls. Customer services and phone response services in the United States may cost a few cents more per minute but may provide a comfort level for you and your customers that gives you a better return on your investment.

Consider the options available to your business by outsourcing your incoming calls to an inbound customer service or a phone answering service. Whether you are facing increased call volume because of the holidays or seasonal variations, you may benefit from testing the waters to see how an inbound call center service or a phone answering service can help your business grow.




Judy O'Brien is a freelance writer for Alert Communications, which offers a variety of inbound call center services solutions along with many other call centers service. Know more about our answering services; visit us on the web at alertcommunications.com.





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 11 August 2011

Web Services - Definitions We Should All Be Familiar With


Web services, SOA, everything-as-a-service: what are all these terms? What do they mean to you? Here's a list of definitions as I see them:

SOA

Service Oriented Architecture. a way of describing a business model that uses cloud computing.

Cloud Computing

The use of Web Services.

Web Services

Software or data served over the Internet as an ongoing service rather than a custom-made or out-of-the-box piece of software or dataset (delivered, say, on CD)

DaaS

Data as a Service. Outsourcing data management to "the cloud" - either "public" data (such as street names) or private data (such as stock lists).

Desktop as a Service: This term hasn't really caught on due to DaaS being generally reserved for "data as a service" or "database as a service". Desktop as a service is a rather more accurate term for the more buzzword-y "Operating System as a Service"; not a true operating system (which boots up the computer and manages a user's hardware resources) but an online desktop which stores your preferences and basically acts as an interface for other web services, just like a normal desktop is a user intterface for traditional software and data.

SaaS

Software as a Service. Outsourcing software to a company "in the cloud" that runs the software, updates it, and allows business access to it for a charge.

PaaS

Platform as a Service. A piece of software delivered as a service that allows development of 3rd-party apps to "plug into" it. Examples: Salesforce.com, Facebook.com

Lesser-known services under the umbrella "everything as a service"

CaaS

Communication as a Service. Delivering telecommunications, instant messaging etc. as a service over the Internet. Telephony as a service, also known as "Voice as a service", employs VOIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol). Software and hardware can be provided as a service by providers.

IaaS

Infrastructure as a Service. Slightly tricksy one, this. Can be taken as being similar to "Operating system as a Service" or "Desktop as a Service", Infrastructure as a Service typically dishes up services centred around hardware as well as software. Wikipedia tells us that "servers, software, data center space or network equipment" are all served in IaaS.

MaaS

Monitoring as a Service. Network/website monitoring delivered as a service. Notifications of network or website problems delivered via SMS, email, etc. Another term not really part of the Web 2.0 Buzzword Boom but still applicable:

Utility Computing

Self-explanatory: providing computing services as a metered utility, in the same way that the services above are delivered as a service. With the sheer weight of as-a-service offerings out on the 'net today, having a clear idea of what these concepts are and how they could benefit your business has never been more pertinent - or difficult.




James Williams, known as Mr Webservice, has a mission to educate people about the benefits of the new wave of "as a service" products delivered over the Internet.

If you would like to know more about software-as-a-service, data-as-a-service, or any other aspect of service-oriented architecture, you should check out his web services blog [http://www.thewebserviceblog.co.uk/].

James Williams works for The Web Service [http://www.thewebservice.com], a company with nearly a decade of experience of delivering innovative web service solutions for developers and businesses through sister brand Postcode Anywhere. Free resources, trials and code snippets are available on-site.

© James L Williams. This article may be reproduced as long as this signature, including links and attribution, is included.





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, 8 August 2011

Outsource Medical Billing Services - Should a Physician Outsource Medical Billing Services


This is a very difficult decision for any physician and partially boils down to this or her own personal ideology and comfort level.

Hospital-based physicians will almost always be better off outsourcing because of the office related expenses that they would not otherwise incur. As the owner of medical billing service you may think I'm naturally biased towards outsourcing. I can assure you that this is not the case.

Physicians who are overly controlling, uncomfortable or mis-trusting toward billing services are nearly impossible to administer. I don't want anything to do with those types of physicians but I completely respect and understand their point of view. Setting all ideology aside I would like to delve into the pros and cons of this difficult and complicated decision.

I am a physician who is very interested in the business aspect of medicine and I do not mind spending my valuable time managing the medical billing aspect of my practice.

Clearly, the best way to do your billing is to do it personally. Obviously, doing it yourself is probably not an option but if you're willing to spend the time and have the interest I would recommend that you do your own billing. Keep in mind that most billing service owners and certainly our employees have limited medical backgrounds. Physicians who study CPT, regularly attend billing seminars and keep up to date on industry changes are the ultimate medical billing gurus in my view.

I am a physician who has absolutely no time or interest in the medical billing aspect of my practice. I am completely reliant upon my office manager and billing staff.

Unfortunately, most physicians are in this position. Even if they were interested in keeping up with all the changes and elements of medical billing the practical reality is that there is absolutely no time. Let's face it; time is your most valuable asset. It's sort of like mowing your own lawn. You'd be way better off financially seeing patients for three hours on Saturday morning. I believe the following information will dramatically help with your decision to outsource your billing or continue to do it yourself and with future decisions in the ever-changing business aspect of medicine.

The pros and cons of outsourcing your medical billing services.

I would like to preface this article with a couple of obvious but important points. If you have a system of controls, keep an open mind about the competence of your office manager, you've got an excellent computer system, proper information systems and your office is doing a superb job at collecting your money, then by all means do not make any changes. Conversely if you're planning to outsource your billing make sure you hire quality firm. I'll spend some time at the end of this article discussing this further.

Most leading experts agree that it costs about 4.5% of net collections to perform the billing function within a physician's office. Incidentally, this is close to my actual cost as well.

Theoretically, a billing service should be able collect more money than a physician's office because it is our core competency. The question is how much more? This is why I focus on how to choose a billing service at the end of this article.

The numbers

A. Lets just do the math in a theoretical model.

We'll base our numbers on a practice whose total gross receivables are $100,000 per month. Obviously, this is an overly simplistic model designed to quantify the aggregate cost and or opportunity cost of the medical billing component only.

Current Aggregate Billing Expenses

In-house expense

Total gross revenue $100,000

Current billing expense $4,500

(4.5%) ---------------

Net Revenue $95,500

Outsourced Billing Expense

Total gross revenue $100.000

Current billing service exp. $7,000

(7.0% net collections) ---------------

Net Revenue $93,000

Net cost increase with outsourcing = $2,500.00

As you can see in this," all things being equal" theoretical model your practice would incur a $2,500 decrease in net revenue with the implementation of a billing outsource strategy. Keep in mind that this model does not address other less tangible issues such as your reduced payroll, computer expenses, ect. In reality the net cost could be substantially less than $2,500. Many physicians will perceive this as a small price to pay while others will consider it to be cost prohibitive.

5% theoretical increase in gross revenue with outsourced billing

Total gross revenue $105,000 (5% increase)

Billing service expense $7,350

(7% net collections) ----------------

Net revenue $97,650

$95,500 - $97,650 = $2,150.00 increase in net revenue.

As you can see from this model with a 5% increase in collections your net revenue will increase $2,150.00 with the added expense of the billing service. Keep in mind that a 5% increase in gross collections is actually quite conservative and should easily be obtainable by quality billing service.

Intangibles

B. A billing service should be able to provide you with a substantial reduction in your day-to-day aggravations such as practice management software issues, fewer employees, hassle of hiring competent employees, less health insurance, less training, ECT..ect. Conversely you will however lose some control over your practice. If the billing service does not collect more money your expenses will increase. It's up to you to determine whether or not the increased expense is offset by decreased aggravation.

security

C. A billing service should be able to increase your security levels by creating a system of checks and balances. As a former police officer I can assure you that crime statistics indicate most embezzlement/fraud/theft occurs from within. During an investigation a store manager for Sears and Roebuck Co. once told me," our customers take it out piecemeal but our employees take it out in wheel barrels" This logic also applies to a doctor's office. A billing service can provide an extra layer of protection because there is a system of independent checks and balances. Typically billing services are fairly large businesses with strict internal controls. My organization Medi-Bill Inc. Operates internally similar to a banking institution with the way we handle funds. It is highly unlikely that the ownership of a reputable medical billing firm would risk the consequences of committing fraud against a client.

Conversely, the issue once again boils down to control. Many physicians are understandably quite unsettled at having their checks and correspondence mailed directly to the billing service. Further compounding this dilemma is," what will happen to the checks and correspondence after the billing service agreement is terminated?"(Again, we will discuss alternatives to this at the end of the article)

Technology

D. State-of-the-art practice management software is an extremely expensive investment. If you've already invested in a high quality computer system I do not believe outsourcing your billing would make much sense financially unless your computer vendor is charging outrageous support fees. If you're considering purchasing a computer system or a medical record management system my favorite vendor who we've been working with for over 15 years is Office Management Solutions (OMS) based in Tampa Florida. The owner's name is John Peake and he is by far the most honest and reputable computer vendor I have ever worked with. OMS can be reached at 813-963-5582 or http://www.oms-online.com.

If you need to update your system, purchase a new system or your support fees are getting out of hand this may be an opportune time to consider outsourcing your medical billing services.

Financial security

F. Many physicians, for obvious reasons do not want their office managers/staffers to have any in-depth knowledge of how much money the practice is making. A reputable and properly run billing service can create this level of financial security. The best case scenario is for your staffers to only see your expenses and have only a limited understanding of the revenue being generated. This can also be accomplished internally by making and recording your own deposits. If you're going to do your own billing I must emphasize the importance of financial security. You must create a system of financial security. If you don't have the time to personally open your mail and make the deposits you are definitely a candidate for outsourcing. Many banks offer a "lockbox" where you can direct your checks and correspondence. Bank lockbox services are generally quite pricey. They usually charge about .25 per copy. You may also opt to take out your own P.O. Box located adjacent to your billing company. This way you still maintain control of your checks and correspondence.

Collection agencies

G. Many billing services own or have affiliate relationships with collection agencies. You'll most definitely want to avoid this situation. Make sure your billing service provides you with a monthly report containing proper information on delinquent accounts enabling your office manager to properly send the information to a collection agency of your choice. In my opinion billing services that own collection agencies or establish close affiliate relationships with them are unethical and should be avoided at all cost. Even though it is nearly impossible to find a collection agency that does not have relationships with medical billing services the point I'm trying to make is to be sure that your billing service is independent and you have the freedom to select a collection agency of your choice. This relationship presents a scenario whereby the billing service can simply go after the easy to collect accounts and allow the more difficult but still collectible ones to slip into the hands of a collection agency who obviously charge a much higher percentage of collections. Again, it's easy to see how a billing service can facilitate or erode your sense of control. The most reputable collection agency I've dealt with is a company called Collection Information Bureau (CIB). I've been doing business with them for years and they have never attempted to establish an affiliate relationship with my company. CIB can be reached at 1-800-231-3514, contact sandy Lopez.

Different types of billing services

There are three different types of billing services.

* Fee per claim

* 50/50

* Full service

Fee per claim billing services charge a flat rate per claim. The fees generally range between $1.25 to $5.00 per claim depending upon the services provided.

Advantages:

· May be helpful to a brand-new practice who is not fully implemented a computer system or is still trying to decide whether to outsource.

· Practices with old or outdated computer systems

· Relatively inexpensive cost per claim

· Excellent for practices who have a problem with only one particular payer group such as Medicare or payers that require electronic claims submission

· Physicians planning to retire within one year

· Highly flexible

· Low-volume practices

· less employees

Disadvantages:

* Expensive for high-volume practices

* Poor integrity of accounts receivable

* Lack of information systems

* Lack of control

50/50

50/50 billing services install computer terminal/terminals in your office. The billing service performs part of the billing process while your office performs the other. As you can probably tell from my list of disadvantages this is in my opinion the least desirable type of billing service.

Advantages:

· Less expensive than full-service billing services

· Avoid the purchase of practice management software

· Creates a system of checks and balances

· less employees

Disadvantages:

* High set up fees

* Low accountability from the billing service

* Lack of control

* Communication Problems(all collection problems will be blamed upon your office)

* Your staff will still probably wind up doing most of the work

* Completely reliant upon the Internet

* Loss of data

* HIPPA issues

Full-service

Advantages:

· completely remove the billing process from your office

· symbiotic relationship

· avoid expensive computer system

· system of checks and balances

· less employees

Disadvantages:

· expensive

· loss of control

· patient relations

· collection agency relationships

Should I outsource my billing checklist: If you answer yes to most of the following questions then you should probably consider outsourcing?

· Is your overall collection rate declining?

· Is your accounts receivable too high?

· Are you experiencing an increased number of denied claims?

· Is your overall frustration level regarding your billing/business office very high?

· Are you facing a major capital investment in new hardware or software?

· Are your computer support fees to high?

· Are you having a difficult time keeping or hiring experienced billing staff?

· Are you spending too much time on the business aspect of medicine?

· Are you concerned that your staff or office manager has knowledge of your income?

· Are you completely reliant upon your office manager?

· Are you planning to expand your practice?

· Do you believe that your practices cost structure is too high?

· Do you have several employees performing tasks that could be handled by a single more experienced manager?

· Is your computer system obsolete?

· Are hardware, software, and information technology disrupting the operation of your practice?

How do I select a billing service?

1. The service should fit or complement the size of your actual practice. Try to get a basic idea of the size of the firm. A solo practice will most likely have greater success with a small to medium-sized billing firm. Obviously, a solo family practitioner would probably not be very well served by a publicly traded firm.

2. Avoid long-term binding contracts. You should be free to terminate your agreement any time within 30 days written notice. The agreement should clearly specify what each side will do for the other. Make sure the agreement assures that upon termination you'll receive a highly detailed account receivable report [listed by individual patient] .

3. Ask for references and call the other providers!

4. Inquire/investigate the actual owner of the company. Ask to speak with the owner directly.

5. Avoid firms who offer too many different types of service. Medical billing is a very highly specialized field. Companies who offer, collection agency services, payroll, financial consulting, tax consulting, malpractice insurance, marketing services etc. etc. are not in my view focused enough on what they're there to do. Collect your money!

6. Ask other physicians. Keep open mind about this one because physicians who are happy with their billing company do not necessarily want them to grow and generally like to keep a low profile on this issue.

7. Is the billing service for sale? Try to ascertain whether or not the firm has recently been sold. In your contract/agreement you should request to be notified within 30 days of the pending sale. In my experience billing services are constantly being bought and sold. Sometimes the acquisition is a positive thing but quite often the merger/acquisition can be very detrimental. You should at least be notified and given ample time to make a proper decision on whether you'll stay with the new firm or select another.

8. Where will your checks and correspondence be mailed? This delicate and important issue need not be as complicated as it appears. Many physicians for obvious reasons are reluctant to allow checks and correspondence to be forwarded directly to their billing service. Some reputable, high-quality billing services will not even provide services to clients who insist upon having the checks and correspondence mailed to them directly. I'd like to spend a few moments on this important issue and explain the ramifications of exactly where your checks and correspondence will be mailed. Maintaining the integrity of your accounts receivable is crucial! If your office routinely fails to properly mail copies of checks and correspondence to your billing company your practice could be in grave danger of losing control of the accounts receivable. If your account receivable is to maintain any semblance of financial integrity it is crucial that billing service employees do not spend valuable time and effort following up on claims that have already paid and not properly forwarded to them. Understandably, your service may even look upon this as an intentional effort to reduce their commissions. Again, bank lock boxes provide a sound alternative to this dilemma. Some practices solve this problem by directing all checks and correspondence to a P.O. Box keeping EOB's separate from other corporate mail. The checks and correspondence are mailed to the billing service," unopened" biweekly. This is an excellent compromise and creates a system of control. There are many other possible options but the important point to remember is that ONE entity must be completely responsible for the validity and integrity of your EOB's.

9. Make sure all checks and correspondence are issued under your tax identification number and made payable to you! Make sure your contract/agreement specifies that the billing service will not countersign or attempt to countersign your checks and correspondence.




David J. Duncan
President and CEO
www.usemedibill.com

Mr. Duncan is a graduate of Florida Atlantic University with a B.A in Finance and is the original founder of Medi-Bill Inc. He also has an extensive law enforcement background and is a former police officer with the City of Fort Lauderdale. Mr. Duncan's reputation for honesty and integrity is well known throughout the medical community. During his career, Mr. Duncan has provided billing, financial and practice management services to physicians and medical practices in a variety of specialties throughout the country. He has extensive experience with, managed-care, hospital contract negotiations, data integration and practice management.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at david@usemedibill.com





This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 23 July 2011

Should Microsoft introduce a disc-less 360?

Microsoft just released its Q2 results, and it’s clear the 360 has gone from being a drag on financials to contributing in a positive way as the company reduces the cost of the console and sees additional demand due to the Kinect.

But since Microsoft has established that the 360 will be around for another 4 to 5 years, it’s clear that its innovation cycle isn’t finished, as it looks to expand its addressable market. While it has talked about doing so by making the 360 more of an entertainment hub, one surefire way to expand the market is by making the 360 available at the $99 price point.

How could Microsoft get there from here? Clearly by continuing on the cost-reduction route, but it also could do something even more radical: Introduce a $99 disc-less Xbox 360.

As I state in my most recent weekly update at GigaOM Pro:

The $99 price point is a psychological barrier that if crossed will push more consumers toward a discretionary purchase. The company sells the low-end 360 S for $199, but it should consider a new “online-only” 360 without the DVD drive that acquires new games and content solely online through Xbox Live.

It seems crazy for a console, where the disk, or physical media, has been a central part of the equation. But Microsoft has long led the console gaming market in online distribution, so why not go radical and just make a low-end device without the disc?

Here’s another reason to consider it: Both Google and Apple TV are bringing their app markets to to the TV screen. How better to compete than by reemphasizing online software distribution with a lower-cost, disc-less box of its own?

What do you think? Should Microsoft consider a disc-less 360?

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/2011/07/22/should-microsoft-introduce-a-disc-less-360/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 370057);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

Click to log in with: Not you? Remember me Submitting comment...
;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Pay for web workers: How much should location matter?

Business is all about the bottom line — ironing out inefficiencies, increasing productivity, finding ways to get or make things cheaply that you can sell high — and web work offers new ways to bolster that bottom line.

By allowing managers to source talent from just about anywhere, technology makes it easy to take advantage of disparities in pay and cost of living to get the same services for cheaper. Just look at the trend of rural-sourcing, where companies are looking for skilled workers in unusual, less settled locales. It’s a boost to struggling rural communities and allows firms to save a few bucks too. What could be bad?

But not everyone sees paying according to the prevailing local wages as without its moral complexities, especially when companies begin to look overseas for additional help. Blog Freelance Switch recently ran a post on the issue, with writer Thursday Bram (who also writes for WWD) musing on her compunctions about paying significantly less for the same services from providers based overseas:

More than a few freelancers have a sore spot about how hard it can be to get paid what we’re worth by clients who see freelancers as a way to get cheap labor. When you turn that around, it’s easy to draw comparisons between what a freelancer might hate when a client does it to her and what she’s willing to do to a sub-contractor based overseas. It’s going to be a personal decision, no matter what. Your priorities decide whether or not you’re willing to pay a sub-contractor more.

For me, the personal decision comes down to what the person I’m working with is actually worth. I know plenty of people who live in places like Thailand and charge rates on par with what folks living in the U.K. might (with no problem getting those rates). If someone comes to me and tells me that’s what they’re worth, I have no problem paying it.

But if the person I’m working with needs training, requires extra explanation or simplified English and generally can’t finish a project without hand holding, I’m going to pay a lot less… I have worked with a virtual assistant based in the Philippines and paid him about $270 a month for his work. I don’t have a problem with doing so — he was doing fairly basic work and didn’t have a skill set that I’d be willing to pay more for.

Bram identifies the key factors in deciding how much to pay someone, including their skill level and your level of comfort with the arrangement. Perhaps added to that should be the cost of living where the web worker is based. After all, $270 probably goes much further in Manila than in Mountain View, just like a salary that barely covers the basics in New York might comfortably provide for a family of four in a more rural area.

How do you weigh location, skills and personal compunction when deciding what to pay web workers in various locales?   

Photo courtesy of Flickr user Infusionsoft

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Friday, 8 July 2011

Why Verizon should buy Hulu

The search for a Hulu buyer continues, with reports emerging that the company is making pitches to a wide range of media and technology companies. While much of the press so far has focused on the big technology companies — Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and the like — little attention has been paid to the other potential buyers. Verizon, in particular, seems like a good match for the company, as it has shown a willingness to invest in online video, but not at the expense of its traditional FiOS TV business.

Google and others in the tech world are all about innovation and disruption, but that’s not necessarily what ABC, NBC and Fox want from a buyer. With Verizon, they’d be getting a partner they’re already doing business with. More importantly, both Verizon and the broadcasters have the same interests, and neither will blindly support growth at Hulu at the expense of live TV viewing or fewer people paying for FiOS.

Verizon, therefore, is less likely to balk at crippling terms in Hulu’s recently renegotiated rights deals. Some reports suggest those deals could extend the time between shows being broadcast and becoming available online by up to a week, rather than being up on Hulu the day after they air.

There’s also the belief that broadcasters could start tying next-day access to Hulu shows to their cable subscriptions. Many cable networks already use pay TV subscriber logins to authenticate users, in a scheme referred to as TV Everywhere. But the latest talks suggest this TV Everywhere plan could be extended to broadcast TV.

While HD over-the-air signals for broadcast TV are free, many broadcasters have begun demanding pay TV operators pay retransmission fees for access to their shows, in the same way they pay per-subscriber fees for cable networks. As a result, those operators might demand Hulu begin authenticating its users in the same way cable networks do.

Google, Amazon, Yahoo and other tech companies might be opposed to such a requirement, as it could affect viewership on the newly acquired site, but it’s actually in Verizon’s best interests to support such a plan. After all, Verizon wants to sign up as many TV Everywhere users as possible, who could then view content from Epix, HBO, Showtime and other networks that have made their content available through the service.

One might ask what Verizon actually gets from Hulu. After all, if the telco is fine with certain rights requirements — like longer windows and authentication — that might limit growth and consumer adoption, and one could argue it’s not fully committed to growing the online video company as an independent business. If that’s the case, then why buy it at all?

For one thing, this type of move isn’t entirely unprecedented. Comcast purchased Fandango back in 2007 and used it for the basis of its Fancast online video portal, which later became Xfinity TV Online. And let’s not forget: Verizon is essentially an IPTV play, and has been supporting IP video for years. It has also recently made a number of moves that suggest it could begin getting a lot more aggressive in the online video space in particular. An acquisition of Hulu would merely supplement those already existing initiatives.

Take, for instance, its plan to allow subscribers to purchase video-on-demand titles through the program guide and watch them online or across a number of mobile or connected devices. Or its yet-to-be-released live streaming iPad app . Or its plan to make its streaming VOD service available to users that aren’t even FiOS subscribers, potentially pitting it against iTunes, Amazon Video On Demand and Walmart’s Vudu. These efforts show a willingness to jump into the online video market, and Hulu would be complementary to those services.

Then there’s Verizon’s Digital Media Services initiative. At NAB this year, it was being pitched as a way to simplify the delivery of broadcast video online, while also lowering the cost of distributing to as many devices and platforms as possible. It’s clear Verizon isn’t just thinking about online video to grow its revenues from the traditional TV or VOD perspective, but it’s also looking at its role as part of the broader ecosystem.

Now that we’ve discussed Verizon’s pros, let’s look at some of the other potential buyers — and why they wouldn’t make such a good fit. Of the aforementioned suitors, there are serious issues with each one:

Google is already knee-deep in its own work to transform YouTube into a destination for long-form professional and semi-professional content, and any combination of YouTube and Hulu is likely to face serious regulatory scrutiny.Amazon is Hulu CEO Jason Kilar’s former employer, and has invested in an online VOD and subscription video service. But it has shown no interest in ad-supported video, which is Hulu’s bread and butter.Microsoft has never invested heavily in digital media properties and seems unlikely to start now.Given Yahoo‘s recent history of acquisitions, it seems clear to most people that a purchase of Hulu could have disastrous results for the site.

In other words, there are plenty of reasons why Hulu might not work with some of the larger tech firms. But there are some very good reasons why a distributor like Verizon would want to buy into a startup like Hulu, even if it is potentially disruptive to the traditional TV business. That’s not to say a Verizon-Hulu mashup would be a slam dunk, but if Verizon were really committed to investing in Hulu’s business as a potential new growth engine, it could be an easy lay-up.

Photo courtesy of (CC BY 2.0) Flickr user Casey Serin.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/video/why-verizon-should-buy-hulu/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 373026);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Here Is Why You Should Consider A Business Brokerage As A Home Based Business


Would You Like To Be The Owner Of An Extremely Profitable Business Brokerage Practice And Make $100K+ A Year Helping Small Businesses -- Even If You Only Have A Few Hours To Spare Each Week And No Money To Start?

If you're looking for the fastest way to start your own business, from your home, starting with very little cash - and you want to make a lot of money - business brokerage may be for you.

The purpose of this article is to give you as much information as possible to help you get started, which you can do from a home office, from your den, from your kitchen table, from your bedroom if you need to! Even if you live in a one-bedroom apartment, there's no reason why you can't get started right away, even if you have no money.

A business brokerage can help you build a successful business, pay off your debts, and build a dream life of success for yourself and your family. Several others have done it, and so can you, if you decide to start your own practice.

You can start your business with very little, or no money and still keep your regular job until you know your business is a success. Many people have started this way and found the lifestyle, freedom and happiness they'd been seeking for years.

And best of all, there is no limit to the amount of money you can make. Once your business is up and running, you can get as big as you want to get. You can stay a small one-man operation, or you can get employees, offices, and grow as much as you want.

Without a doubt, a Small Business Brokerage is one of the last businesses left in the world that the anyone can realistically afford to start, from home, in their spare time, and yet have the opportunity to grow as big and as fast as they want.

And it's a fantastic business, because your customers are, just like you, entrepreneurs, business owners, visionaries, risk takers, AND, they love what you do for them.

To small business owners, a skilled business broker who can help to sell a business is the most important person in the world. No need to spend all kinds of time finding a qualified buyer for their prized and successful business. No need to decide on the best price to sell the business for. No need to waste time on speaking with potential buyers when they're busy making money.

Fact is, small business owners do not have time to sell their own business and are willing to pay a hefty fee (normally $12,000 or more) to a competent broker.

This relatively new profession is making big news as a high income business. You can either conduct your business from the comfort of your home or from a traditional office. In addition, you can start with virtually no cash and start making big money right away.

Here's why making money is not difficult in this business:

1. A Large Market. It is estimated that 18% of businesses are sold each year in the U.S., and there are approximately $360 billion worth of businesses sold each year.

2. High Selling Price. Industry survey has shown that the average small business selling price is about $250,000.

3. High Success Fees. The average commission to a broker who sells a business is $18,300 or more.

4. High Yearly Income. According to the latest information in The Business Reference Guide, the average home-based business broker earns between $300,000 and $400,000 in annual commissions.

5. No overhead. You can start right where you are, in the comfort of your home, and pocket all your fees as profits.

6. No License Required. There are no specific business broker's license requirements and just 16 states require you to have a real estate agent license (AK, AZ, CA, FL, GA, ID, MI, MN, NE, NV, OR, SD, UT, WA, WI, WY, and IL requires a registration process only). Getting a real estate license is relatively easy and has never stopped anyone from succeeding in this fantastic business.

A business Brokerage is one of the last professions that is virtually unaffected by recession and inflation. More people tend to move to new areas...more people want to earn more money...many are locked into salaried jobs.

Their Choices?

Stay and deplete savings, or use those savings to buy an existing business with net earnings that meet their needs.

There's an abundance of sellers, too. Making this business even more attractive is the fact that the baby-boomer generation is aging fast and many of them are business owners, adding millions to the pool!

If, you are well organized, and like dealing with people and helping them resolve problems, then this high-income professional home-based business is for you!

Here are some of the most common ways you can earn money as a business broker:

a) Broker the sales of small businesses. Charge commissions between 5% and 12% of the sales price and set a minimum fee of $6,500 to $12,000, depending of the sale price.

b) Co-Broker sales with other business brokers. Expand your sales potential through co-brokering arrangements. Each year, 2.5 million businesses change hands, giving us a $360 billion market to earn big fees!

c) Establish solid relationships with Repeat and/or Corporate buyers. With businesses changing hands every five years on average, you can have a great relationship with many past buyers and sellers assisting them in future transactions.

d) Earn fees by helping to Finance the purchases you broker.

e) Earn fees by providing Valuation services to owners before they sell. Some valuation experts charge $5,000 or more for this service and there is a big need for it.

f) Earn fees by writing business plans for owners who want to raise financing. Anyone looking to raise money from banks or investors have to have a business plan. 99% of business owners either don't have the time, or do not know how to write business plans. That's where you come in.

g) Skyrocket your fees with Commission Investment. One of the sweetest rewards of business brokerage is that you can own a piece of a never ending variety of businesses that appeal to you, without ever investing a dime of your own money. This is one of the easiest ways to build a fast fortune starting with absolutely nothing.

Getting Started: What to Do First - It's Not What You Might Think...

Normally you'd be given the following advice if you wanted to start your own business.

i) Consult with a lawyer to make sure you set up the right legal structure.

ii) Check with the county clerk's office to make sure "they permit a business like yours from a home office."

iii) Buy business insurance and "talk to an accountant" to make sure you're not missing anything.

iv) Get a toll-free number (to give the impression that your business is big).

v) Invest in great business cards and letterheads.

That kind of advice will drive you right into failure because every one of these suggestions involves:

a) spending money and

b) complicating you life

None of these engage you into activities that will help build your practice. To get your business off the ground quickly:

>> Don't do anything you don't have to do until you have sold your first business. Setting up a corporation, buying insurance, and getting your local status secured is a waste of time when starting up a home based business brokerage practice.

>> After you have made the first sale, make another one. And then another one. And then, print business cards. Don't worry about stationery. Just keep making sales.

>> Once you are confident of your ability to match qualified buyers to willing sellers, it is time to organize a marketing plan so you can rollout your practice for good. This may involves hiring other brokers, moving into an office, advertising, etc.

>> Notify regulators and government agencies after your first sale when you do have money coming in and must pay your taxes. Doing so beforehand is useless.




Small Business Planning, Financing, Sale & Purchase - [http://whiteoakpartnersinc.com]



This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 25 June 2011

Four Key PPC Web Analytics Metrics You Should Consider

By Kirsty Lee


Watch your bounce rate

A high bounce rate is a good indication that your content isn't engaging.

PPC is an important strand of your web analysis. One of the cool things about PPC data is that you don’t need a lot of history to draw conclusions from it – a few weeks is enough time to give you an idea of how well a campaign is performing.


Google Adwords data is included in your Google Analytics data and includes metrics like click through rate (CTR) and cost per click (CPC). Google recently released AdWords API v201101, which allows you to more efficiently run reports, as well as implement campaign experiments and other recently released advertising features at scale.


But how do you track success after PPC visitors are on your site? What metrics should you investigate to ensure that you are getting high quality traffic and capitalizing on opportunities to convert?


For these types of performance metrics, you need web analytics! Here are four important metrics you should review on a daily basis to evaluate PPC campaign performance. 


1. Conversions


It pretty much goes without saying that conversions are the best metric to determine how a PPC campaign is performing. You should have your web analytics set up to record both online conversions (newsletter subscriptions, content downloads) and offline conversions (phone calls, offline campaigns).


To track online conversions, configure your web analytics to record a conversion every time someone arrives on a specific URL. In the case of web forms, this URL would be something like a thank you or confirmation page. For downloads, you might need to add a piece of tracking code that will register the download as a pageview.


To track offline conversions, see one way of doing this in our previous post on Measuring Success of Offline Campaigns in Google Analytics. There are plenty of other solutions out there for tracking other offline conversions (e.g. by telephone) which will integrate directly into your web analytics program so you only have to access one dashboard.


2. Bounce Rate


A bounce is when someone lands on a site and leaves without viewing any other pages. Your bounce rate will vary for each campaign. A high bounce rate may be an indication that your content is not relevant or engaging to visitors.


3. Pages Per Visit


The interesting data comes from a very low or a very high number of page views. Very low could mean that visitors are not finding content useful or interesting, and have resigned to go back to search results to find a more relevant page. A high number of page views could mean either you are producing interesting and engaging content (look at time spent on page for engagement), or that the visitor cannot find the content they are looking for.


In both cases, review the relevance of the page content to traffic-producing keywords, and make sure the information people appear to be seeking is on the landing page, or a click away.


4. Average Time on Site


It goes without saying that a higher time on site is better than a low one. Extremely low (0-1 second) — There is no way to read a page’s content in this amount of time. If there are a lot of visitors spending less than a second on the site, it may be the result of one of two things:



  • Invalid clicks – Check with your PPC platform to ensure you are not being charged for these.

  • Slow site load time – May cause people to get frustrated and hit the back button before ever arriving on the landing page. Low (less than 15 seconds) — Generally, those visitors who spent 10 seconds or less on a site quickly decided that they were in the wrong place. This may be because at a first glance they didn’t find any relevant information, see their keywords anywhere on the page, or were confused by the landing page’s layout.


Look at these 4 web analytics metrics and you will have a better idea of your PPC performance. Once you have gathered enough data to draw conclusions about which parts of your campaign work well and which don’t work so well, you can start implementing small changes and tracking the different outcomes. By taking this methodical approach you should be able to optimize your campaigns to get the best ROI.








Kirsty Lee works for We Are Cloud, a French company that created Bime, a SaaS Business Intelligence and Analytics tool. For more information, please visit http://bimeanalytics.com. .

This is a post from The Web Optimist – SEO in The Desert.


Four Key PPC Web Analytics Metrics You Should Consider is a post from: SEO in The Desert | More about Palm Springs SEO




Generated by BlogIt

BlogIt - Auto Blogging Software for YOU!

BlogIt - autoblogging software for YOU

BlogIt - autoblogging software for YOU