Showing posts with label Could. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Could. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 September 2011

Could Nokia's Sea Ray Be Delayed Until 2012?

You are in a Windows Phone Post

When is Nokia's Sea Ray WP7 smartphone going to finally arrive? We looked into some of the latest news and rumors surrounding the handset's release earlier this month, and at that point it seemed like we'd see a limited European release before the end of the year, with wider global distribution following in 2012. Now we've run across a new rumor that says we might have to wait until 2012 for even the European release of the Sea Ray.

The Street's Scott Moritz presents this as an unconfirmed rumor from an unnamed source, citing delays in the phone's release schedule. According to him, they would mean Nokia would wouldn't get the Sea Ray out anywhere in 2011. We'll have to wait and see if any evidence arrives supporting his claims, but are they at least plausible?

Last week, Nokia tweeted that its first WP7 smartphones would most assuredly be out sometime in 2011. If Moritz is right, there's the possibility that problems have crept up in the past week, or the chance that the Sea Ray will not be the first Nokia WP7 device. We mentioned this possibility earlier, since there are a couple other potential WP7 phones from Nokia that we've heard about, and while Moritz specifically talks about the Sea Ray, Nokia did not identify the model mentioned in its confirmation (though Moritz seems to believe the Sea Ray will, in fact, be the first Nokia WP7 model). It might seem more likely that Moritz got some bad information, but there's a chance he could be onto something here.


Update: Nokia is sticking to its guns, reiterating its plans for a WP7 release this year.

Source: The Street (YouTube)
Via: The Nokia Blog

Previous Page Next Page

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Friday, 23 September 2011

Windows 8 Could Have Phone Features Too

You are in a Windows Phone Post

Long Zheng has noticed some interesting references to telephony features in Windows 8, both via the Microsoft Build session on live tiles and a Windows 8 App demo on Winrumors. You'll notice a live tile that shows missed calls, another that shows text messages, and in the contact's card you'll see options to text or call the person you're looking at. There's also evidence that the prototype Samsung Slate PC that was given to developers at the Build conference includes a 3G chip with voice calling capabilities as opposed to just data. The radio supports quad-band 2G and peta-band 3G.

This type of integration could point to Windows 8 tablets performing double duty as mobile phones. However, I kind of hope the integration is more of a wireless connection to a separate smaller Windows Phone 7 device. I would love to be able to respond to text messages from a large-screen Windows 8 PC interface while my phone and its SIM card are just sitting on the desk nearby or in a pocket. Being able to initiate a call from the PC instead of having to pick up my mobile phone and use its small-screen interface to make a call would be pretty neat too. Ideally both scenarios would be supported by Windows 8.

Source: iStartedSomething

Previous Page Next Page

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Monday, 12 September 2011

nVidia Tegra Chipsets Could Come To Windows Phone In 2013

Both Wave One and Wave Two Windows Phone devices are usinmg Qualcomm's chipsets -- as the Microsoft minimum hardware requirements for the platform themselves require them. This makes Windows Phone and Windows Phone Mango a Qualcomm only platform.

In 2013 though -- the time Windows Phone Tango, Apollo or even Windows 8 could land -- phones powered by Redmond's platform could very well be operated by Tegra chipsets, according to the roadmap above. nVidia's SOCs have been powering Android smartphones for quite a while now -- aside from the tablets they operate too -- but it looks like after Kal El+, the chipset maker is planning to offer both Android and Windows/Windows Phone support. It will be interesting to see if the phones will be Tegra-only -- like they're Qualcomm-only now -- or will the user be able to choose from a wide range of phones, powered by Tegras, Snapdragons and why not, TI OMAPs?

Source: Heise
Via: WPCentral


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Saturday, 30 July 2011

BSkyB shows how streaming could be the future of pay TV


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Friday, 22 July 2011

Cloud computing could lead to billions in energy savings

Another study out this week has found that if companies adopt cloud computing, they can reduce the energy consumption of their IT and save money on energy bills. The report, created by research firm Verdantix and sponsored by AT&T, estimates that cloud computing could enable companies to save $12.3 billion off their energy bills. That translates into carbon emission savings of 85.7 million metric tons per year by 2020.

The Verdantix report isn’t the first one to deliver such a finding. Last year Pike Research found that cloud computing could lead to a 38 percent reduction in worldwide data center energy use by 2020, compared to what the growth of data center energy consumption would be without cloud computing. Another study from Microsoft, Accenture and WSP Environment and Energy last year found that moving business applications to the cloud could cut the associated per-user carbon footprint by 30 percent for large, already-efficient companies and as much as 90 percent for the smallest and least efficient businesses.

All of that is good news. Cloud computing is one of the most disruptive Internet infrastructure shifts to happen in recent years. Web companies have been embracing cloud computing in order to buy flexible, lower cost, on-demand computing power from companies like Amazon. And these cloud computing services generally replace the computing that would have been done by companies’ own in-house computing resources.

However, it’s always good to take these studies with a grain of salt. There’s a reason AT&T and Microsoft are looking into the energy efficiency of cloud computing: they sell cloud computing services.

Other studies have also found that cloud computing isn’t always the most energy efficient computing option, and in certain instances the cloud can be more energy intensive than traditional in-office computing. A report from University of Melbourne researcher Rod Tucker and his team, which I wrote about for GigaOM Pro (subscription required), found that cloud computing can indeed save energy when it leads simply to the consolidation of servers, but looking at three different applications of cloud computing — storage, software and processing —  energy efficiency savings are negated in some scenarios.

For example, one such instance when the cloud isn’t more efficient, according to Tucker’s research, is when companies are using cloud computing for storing data. Tucker found that when the number of downloaded and accessed files becomes larger (more than one download per hour for a public cloud storage service), those energy efficiency gains are erased.

There’s enough research out there by now that shows that cloud computing is overall more energy efficient than traditional in-house computing. Which is great news for Internet companies and cloud computing providers. The growing energy consumption of the Internet, data centers and our always-on connected devices will only continue to grow, so efficiency trends will only to continue to become important.

Image courtesy of The Planet.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/cleantech/cloud-computing-could-lead-to-billions-in-energy-savings/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 380004);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

Click to log in with: Not you? Remember me Submitting comment...
;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 21 July 2011

How big data could change what you watch on TV

Los Angeles-based startup What’s Watched aggregates data from social media and mobile applications to provide media companies with a view into what shows are being watched and who’s watching them. That data can then be used to target specific demographics of users to increase ratings and grow their audiences.

In addition to publicly available data from Netflix, iTunes Twitter and Rotten Tomatoes’ Flixster app, What’s Watched incorporates data from some apps that it has built. They include social TV app ScreenTribe, Facebook for iPad app Friended and TV guide app Zap2it, which it developed in conjunction with Tribune Media Services. Using those data sets it has also built an ad platform for targeted mobile campaigns.

According to What’s Watched CEO Matt Wiggins, the real value of the data it collects is the ability to map the social graph for TV viewers, which allows it to categorize users into different clusters or “tribes” based on the way they use social media. The startup can then offer that data to broadcasters to help them understand how users interact with their shows, and which users are most influential.

“You need to target specific people to get a ratings lift,” Wiggins said on stage at the Social TV Summit in Los Angeles Wednesday. Comparing What’s Watched to Billy Beane’s Oakland A’s in Moneyball, he said that the company can help identify users that media companies can target to increase ratings. With the startup’s data in hand, broadcasters can make more efficient decisions about which groups of users to go after.

What’s Watched isn’t the only company trying to tackle this problem: New York-based media marketing firm Simulmedia also seeks to help networks boost ratings for their shows by using data sets to predict where they should advertise to drum up interest in new shows. And Bluefin Labs can help identify affinity groups between different shows, allowing media companies and marketers to know which shows are likely to have common viewers.

What’s Watched has raised a small amount of angel funding but according to Wiggins is already profitable, with about 25 employees altogether.

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 14 July 2011

How Kinect could turn smartphones into robots

Microsoft’s Robotics Developer Studio, a software platform for programming robots, gains support for the company’s popular Xbox Kinect accessory Wednesday through a free download. Adding Kinect service support allows developers to create and program robots that use Kinect to see and hear.

The Kinect game accessory, which enables video game interaction through full-body gestures, has found a number of uses in the hacking community and Microsoft’s addition of Kinect services to robotics extends the popular product even farther. But Kinect’s future could be in even more intelligent smartphones.

According to EETimes, Microsoft’s 2010 purchase of gesture-recognition company Canesta, and its chip-level pattern recognition, may provide a return in the form of a smaller Kinect-type product that fits into a handset:

Canesta’s engine is said to outperform the PrimeSensor which Microsoft is currently licensing from PrimeSense Ltd. (Tel-Aviv, Israel) for its Kinect. When Microsoft commercializes the Canesta-invented chip-level work-alike of the PrimeSensor, it will be able to downsize the foot-long Kinect to about a square centimeter, enabling tiny robots and other mobile devices, such as the Windows Phone, to perform sophisticated gesture recognition for natural user interfaces, autonomous navigation and many other tasks.

This type of technology is exactly what I alluded to last year when I noted that today’s smartphones could power tomorrow’s robots in a GigaOM Pro report (subscription required). The computing power of smartphones has increased dramatically with each new generation of mobile processors, and based on the quad-core chips coming later this year, that pattern looks to continue. At the same time, sensors that can see and hear — think of smartphone cameras and advanced multi-array microphones that eliminate background noise — have also improved.

Connectivity to the cloud, a smartphone must-have, expands the “brains” of a robot by allowing for nearly limitless information. Sure, you can store a fair amount of data on a smartphone with 32 GB of storage capacity, but access to the vast information bases of Wikipedia, Google and other sites brings even more smarts to a smartphone-powered robot. What’s missing then is what Kinect hardware and software can bring: strong gesture and object recognition.

Ironically, Microsoft isn’t the first to integrate its own Kinect product with robotics, even though it has had a robotics software platform since 2006. Robot enthusiasts have already done so on their own by accessing the raw data stream from the Kinect’s USB connection. Willow Garage also offers the Turtlebot kit (shown above), complete with Kinect and a Windows-powered netbook.

And in May of this year, Google introduced Android support for robotics, even demonstrating the use of Kinect to see the audience during the presentation. Regardless of who embraced the Kinect technology when, if Microsoft can shrink the system down for use in handsets, you may carry your smartphone during the day, but dock it in a mobile robot for use at home during the night.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):

window.fbAsyncInit = function() {FB.init({appId: 180650338636285, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});FB.api({method: 'links.getStats',urls: 'http://gigaom.com/mobile/how-kinect-could-turn-smartphones-into-robots/'},function(response) {jQuery('#react-fb-count-button').html(response[0].commentsbox_count);});FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function(response) {var ajaxurl = 'http://gigaom.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=new_fb_comment&post_id=';jQuery.get(ajaxurl + 375787);});};var e = document.createElement('script');e.type = 'text/javascript';e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';e.async = true;document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);

var _comscore = _comscore || []; _comscore.push({ c1: "2", c2: "6036014" }); (function() { var s = document.createElement("script"), el = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.async = true; s.src = (document.location.protocol == "https:" ? "https://sb" : "http://b") + ".scorecardresearch.com/beacon.js"; el.parentNode.insertBefore(s, el); })();

;(function($){$.fn.trackClick = function(){// track the clicktry {_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', this.parents('[id!=""]:first').get(0).id, 'clicked', (this.text() || this.children('img:first').attr('alt'))]);}catch (err) {}// wait a moment for the tracking to process, then follow the linksetTimeout('document.location = "' + $(this).attr('href') + '"', 200);};$('#brand-explorer a, #navigation a, .widget-wrap a').click(function () {$(this).trackClick();return false;}); })(jQuery);

View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

Netflix could beat cable TV in Latin America

In the U.S. and Canada, Netflix has largely positioned itself as a complement to existing pay TV services. With its great Latin American adventure, it may have the opportunity to not just supplement pay TV, but to replace it in that region. The combination of low pay TV adoption, as well as growing broadband penetration, means that Netflix could become the primary subscription video service that many Latin American consumers pay for.

In a research report issued Sunday, Goldman Sachs noted that while low broadband penetration could be a limiting factor for adoption of its streaming video service, that factor is largely outweighed by a lack of competition in the region. That’s true not just for other streaming services, of which very few exist outside of Brazil’s NetMovies, but for subscription video services in general.

Take the table below, for instance. Less than a quarter of residents pay for cable or satellite TV services in Latin America, compared to about 90 percent in the U.S. In some markets — most notably Brazil and Argentina — broadband penetration is actually greater than pay TV adoption.

Unlike in the U.S. and Canada, where its streaming service emerged as a supplement to people’s existing pay TV subscriptions, Netflix has the opportunity to become the primary subscription video service for Latin America residents, according to Goldman Sachs:

“[C]ompetition from Pay TV providers (and TV Everywhere-like services) is weak if not non-existent in Latin America, as Pay TV penetration is still less than 25% in Latin America vs. more than 90% in the US. We believe that consumers without Pay TV subscriptions could potentially choose to subscribe to Netflix instead of Pay TV to supplement their free-to-air viewing.”

While there’s lack of true competition in Latin America, there’s some concern that Netflix adoption might be hampered by slow broadband speeds in the region. Goldman Sachs Latin America telecom analyst Lucio Aldworth estimates the average broadband speed in the region to be about 2 Mbps, compared to about 5-6 Mbps in the U.S. While that’s not enough to get full-screen HD quality to connected TVs, it’s good enough for Netflix’s “Good” streaming quality, which is set at about 700 kbps for video and audio.

There’s also the issue of broadband caps, which cropped up in Netflix’s Canadian rollout and could affect its adoption in Latin America as well. Some Brazilian ISPs have caps as low as 10 GB of data, which represents about 30 hours of content on Netflix’s lowest quality, or about 15-20 movies a month. But that’s assuming subscribers aren’t doing anything else with their broadband connections.

The good news for Netflix is that U.S. content is extremely popular in the region, and can be had relatively cheaply. Goldman Sachs reports that in conversations with the company, Netflix has claimed about 75 percent of movie viewership and half of TV viewership is produced in the U.S. Because Netflix is effectively creating a brand new revenue stream in a relatively untapped market (and helping to fight DVD piracy in the process), Goldman Sachs believes it was able to get good terms for catalog content in a region where studios weren’t able to monetize those assets.

Now, the only thing holding Netflix back is having a recognizable brand throughout. The streaming service was able to achieve 8 percent penetration of the broadband market in Canada in just six months. But unlike Canada, where it had some brand recognition due to proximity to the U.S., many potential users in Latin America likely have no idea what Netflix is. As a result, Goldman Sachs expects the adoption rate to be much slower, and the amount of time it takes to break even in Latin America to be about twice as long as the 12 months Netflix expects it to take its Canadian venture to break even.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription req’d):


View the original article here


This post was made using the Auto Blogging Software from WebMagnates.org This line will not appear when posts are made after activating the software to full version.

Thursday, 23 June 2011

5 Retail Companies That Could Survive The Summer Slump




Retail Sales Beating

Janney Capital Markets (a subsidiary of Penn Mutual) reports on weekend activity among popular fashion retailers, saying that consumers seem to be unwilling to spend, and, as a result, retailers are using promotions and discounts to move product.  Companies mentioned in their report include:



  • Ann Taylor (NYSE:ANN):  The shares have traded in a 52-week range of $14.59 to $32.49 and most recently traded at $2756.  Its market capitalization is $1.43 billion, year over year quarterly revenue growth is 10%, and year over year quarterly earnings growth is 20.8%.  About the company:  AnnTaylor Stores Corporation, through its wholly owned subsidiary, retails women’s apparel, shoes, and accessories primarily under the Ann Taylor brand name. The Company operates throughout the United States. Ann Inc. Earnings Cheat Sheet: Profit Rises Year Over Year>>

  • Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF): The shares have traded in a 52-week range of $29.94 to $77.65 aqnd most recently traded at $67.93.  Its market capitalization is $5.96 billion, and its year over year quarterly revenue growth is 21.6%.  About the company:  Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is a specialty retailer that operates stores selling casual apparel, such as knit shirts, graphic t-shirts, jeans, woven shirts and personal care and other accessories for men, women and kids. The Company operates stores in the United States and Canada as well as retails its products over the Internet.


  • Gap (NYSE:GPS):  The shares have traded in a 52-week range of $16.62 to $23.73 and most recently traded at $18.15.  Its market capitalization is $9.99 billion, its year over year quarterly revenue growth is -1%, and its year over year quarterly earnings growth is -22.8%.  About the company:  The Gap, Inc., is an international specialty retailer operating retail and outlet stores. The Company sells casual apparel, accessories and personal care products for men, women, and children. The Gap operates stores in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, and Japan.


  • Bebe Stores (NASDAQ:BEBE):   The shares have traded in a 52-week range of $5.36 to $7.32, and most recently traded at $6.22.  Its market capitalization is $522.88 million, and its year over year quarterly revenue growth is 0.6%.  About the company:  bebe stores, inc. designs, develops, and produces a line of contemporary women’s apparel and accessories. The Company markets its products under the bebe, bebe moda, and bbsp brand names. bebe operates retail stores in the United States. Canada, and the United Kingdom.


  • Chico’s FAS (NYSE:CHS):  The shares have traded in a 52-week range of $8.22 to $15.64 and most recently traded at $14.90 per share.  Its market capitalization is $2.63 billion, its year over year quarterly revenue growth is 11.5%, and its year over year quarterly earnings growth is 29.7%.   About the company:  Chico’s FAS, Inc. sells private label women’s casual clothing and related accessories. The Company’s clothing includes tops, pants, shorts, skirts, and dresses. Chico’s owns and operates stores throughout the United States.


Competitors to these companies include: Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:URBN), Aeropostale (NYSE:ARO), The Buckle, Inc. (NYSE:BKE), Children’s Place Retail (NASDAQ:PLCE), and Limited Brands, Inc. (NYSE:LTD).


This post originally appeared on Wall St. Cheat Sheet.


Please follow Money Game on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation about this story »

See Also:







Generated by BlogIt

BlogIt - Auto Blogging Software for YOU!

BlogIt - autoblogging software for YOU

BlogIt - autoblogging software for YOU